Topics covered

Authority | Authority transfer | Network Commands

In a networked game, an object's logic is always run by one node on the network, whether it's a Client or a Server (which we call a Simulator in coherence). We say that the node "has authority" on the network entity.

There are cases where it makes sense to transfer authority, like it happens in this project with objects that can be picked up. When the player grabs an object, the Client performing it requests authority over the network entity. Once it gets authority it starts running its scripts and has full control over it. This is a very good way to go when only one player can interact with a certain object at a given time.

However, there are cases when we don't want to change who has authority on an entity. In the case of an object that many players can interact with at the same time, it wouldn't make sense to continuously move authority between nodes.

The interaction with such remote entities then needs to happen entirely through Network Commands.

Our use case

In this project, it is the case of the chairs placed in the scene. The first Client or Simulator to connect will take authority over them, and it will keep it until they disconnect.

When a player wants to sit down on a chair, they inform the Authority that they are doing so. The client holding authority will then set the chair as busy, which prevents other players from sitting on it next time they try.

However, for the sake of simplicity and to illustrate the point, we intentionally left this interaction a bit flaky. Can you guess why? What could go wrong with this setup?

The code

The action originates in SitAction.cs:

public void Sit(Chair chairComponent)
{
    if (!_chair.isBusy)
    {
        _chair.Occupy();
    }
{

SitAction checks if the isBusy property of the chair is set to true (by the authority, of course). If so, it means someone else is already sat on the chair. If false, we can sit. So it invokes Chair.Occupy().

[Sync] public bool isBusy;

And further down, the essence of the interaction:

public void Occupy()
{
    if (sync.HasStateAuthority) ChangeState(true);
    else sync.SendCommand<Chair>(nameof(ChangeState), MessageTarget.AuthorityOnly, true);
}

public void Free()
{
    if (sync.HasStateAuthority) ChangeState(false);
    else sync.SendCommand<Chair>(nameof(ChangeState), MessageTarget.AuthorityOnly, false);
}

[Command(defaultRouting = MessageTarget.AuthorityOnly)]
public void ChangeState(bool newBusyState)
{
    isBusy = newBusyState;
    // Deactivates the collider so the chair can't be even selected
}

So both when occupying a chair (Occupy()) or standing up (Free()), the player executing the action invokes the ChangeState method, either directly or as a Network Command - depending if they are the one with authority.

So one way or the other, ChangeState gets executed on the authority, who sets the isBusy property to its new value. On the next coherence update, the property will be sent to the other Clients.

What could go wrong?

The answer: Clients are using the isBusy property as a check for whether they can sit or not. It is possible that two players will approach a chair at the same time, check if isBusy is false (and yes, it will be false), at which point they will inform the authority that want to sit down on it.

The authority performs no additional checks, so you will see both players successfully sitting on the chair, overlapping on each other.

Thankfully we also coded the rest of the interaction so that this doesn't break the game. So while this incidence and the consequences for this interaction are low-risk, if you're looking to create a more robust system it could make sense to implement a check on the authority, and have the Client wait for an answer before they sit down.

We do this in other parts of the demo, like when chopping a tree or when picking up an object. Check the following section on chopping trees to explore this similar but more complex use case.

Topics covered

| |

Network entities need to be created and removed all the time. This can be due to entities getting in and out of a LiveQuery, or simply because gameplay requires so. If that is the case, we can leverage coherence's object pooling system in order to avoid costly calls to Instantiate and Destroy, which are famously expensive operations in Unity.

Our use case

In this project we use pooling for one very clear use case: the tree logs that get spawned when chopping down a tree.

This was a natural choice as players will be chopping trees all the time, but we can also assume that they will burn the logs on the fire almost as often. So by pre-allocating a pool of around 10 logs, we should be covered in most cases.

Prefab setup

To set up the log to behave like this, all we did was to set that option on the log's own CoherenceSync inspector.

A pool configured like this means that coherence will pre-spawn 10 instances of the Prefab at the beginning of the game.

However if we were to need more, we could request more instances and they would be created and added to the pool. The game can even go above 20. If that were to happen, any instance released beyond 20 wouldn't just be returned to the pool, but would be destroyed.

In other words, 10 and 20 represent the lower and upper limit for the amount of memory we are reserving for the logs alone in our game. We are considering anything above 20 as a temporary exception.

When we press Play, coherence instantiates these 10 logs, deactivate them, and put the pool in the DontDestroyOnLoad scene:

Because they are inactive, their CoherenceSync components are not syncing any value.

Spawning a new log

To spawn a new log we only need to call one line of code. However, we don't provide a reference to a regular Prefab like we would with Instantiate. We instead leverage the CoherenceSyncConfig object that represents the log.

This CoherenceSyncConfig contains all the info that coherence needs to handle this particular Prefab over the network. If we inspect it, we will notice that it contains in fact how the object is loaded (Load via) and how it's instantiated (Instantiate via).

You can notice how this is the same info we saw while configuring the CoherenceSync before.

Now that we have a reference to it, we can spawn the log with one line of code. In the ChoppableTree script, we do something like:

This line looks remarkably similar to Unity's own Instantiate in its syntax. The difference is that it gives us back a reference to the CoherenceSync attached to the log instance that will be enabled. From this, we can do all sorts of setup operations by just fetching other components with GetComponent, to prepare the instance.

Burning a log

When we are done with it (in this case, when it's thrown into the campfire), we can dispose of it:

(this line is in the Burnable.cs class, inside the GetBurned() method)

The instance is then automatically returned into the pool, and disabled.

Cleaning up

When taking an instance out of the pool or when returning it, coherence doesn't automatically do any particular clean up to its state.

As such, when we reuse a pool instance, it is good practice to think of what values should be reset that might have been messed up by previous usage. We should think about what happens during gameplay, and use OnEnable / OnDisable as needed to ensure that disabled instances are put in a state that makes them ready to be used again.

For this project, since an object can be burned while being carried, we do some cleaning in the OnDisable of the Grabbable.cs class to prepare the wood logs for another round, like so:

Topics covered

| |

It's often the case that in addition to objects being fully owned by players, like their characters, there is often the need to have objects that exist only in one copy in the world and that need to store a complex state that needs to be reflected in the same way on each Client. And the state might not be a simple int or bool that can be just automatically synced over the network whenever it changes, but something more complex that requires to be elaborated.

This is often the case for more invisible objects like a leaderboard, a spawn point, a score counter or a match timer; but can also be the case for objects that have graphics.

Our use case

An example of such an object, that also happens to be very central to this demo, is the campfire. As the players pick up objects and throw them on the fire, the campfire needs to perform a calculation based on a timer and the type of the object burned to decide which fire effect to play.

Timing is key here! If two players throw in two objects, one right after the other, they activate a special effect that makes the campfire burn bigger and brighter. But the two objects need to get on the fire within 2.5 seconds from each other (it's the teamEffortLength variable in the Campfire.cs script).

Because this calculation depends on the timer value that is managed by the Authority, we can't just independently calculate a result on each Client, as they would almost certainly end up with different results. We need to inform the Authority that the action is taking place, let it figure out the final state, and only then propagate the resulting state and actions to all Clients.

(1) Action happens on a Client -> (2) Authority campfire is notified, processes result -> (3) Authority campfire sends result to all others -> (4) Non-authority campfire objects execute local effects

We do have an extra challenge here though. Ultimately we want the Authority to inform everyone to play specific visual and sound effects depending on the object burned. But we can't send Network Commands with a reference to audio assets or particle systems. So we need to change this information to something we can send, and then on the receiving end, "unpack it" and transform it into the info we actually need (i.e., which sound).

The code

If you look into the Campfire.cs script, you will find this sequence of actions as exemplified by the flow below:

(1) The player throws an object on the fire. BurnObjectLocal() is invoked by the Burnable that collided with the Campfire. The script checks if Authority is already on this Client:

The method invoked in both cases is BurnObject(), but it's invoked differently depending on whether it is local (direct invocation) or remote (using SendCommand via the CoherenceSync).

We use the ID of the CoherenceSyncConfig of the object that burned as a parameter. The ID is a string, so it's something we can send over the network.

(2) The logic for which fire effect to play is then calculated in BurnObject().

The campfire uses the CoherenceSyncConfig ID as a key to look into the CoherenceSyncConfigRegistry, and find the right object archetype to play the right effect.

(3) ChangeFireState() is invoked locally on the Authority. Here the Authority updates its own property activeFireEffect which, being a synced property, gets sent to the other Clients.

But updating that int wouldn't be enough to tell which sound to play, so we send a command to invoke the FireStateChanged() method, passing the CoherenceSyncConfig ID which the non-authoritative campfire instances can use to trace down the object that burned in the CoherenceSyncConfigRegistry.

(4) The non-authoritative clients execute FireStateChanged(), which turn on/off the appropriate fire particles, and play a specific sound.

Picking up when somebody leaves

If the Client (or a Simulator) detaining the authority on the campfire disconnects, we need to make sure that whoever gets assigned authority next can pick up the job exactly where it was left off, and continue simulating the campfire logic without interruption.

That's why in the Campfire.cs class we make sure to sync three values:

• activeFireEffect is an index (expressed as an integer) of which fire effect should be playing right now.

• fireTimer and bigFireTimer are two countdowns that indicate how much time the fire will still burn normally or, when in "big fire mode", brighter.

However, there's an opportunity to be smart here. fireTimer and bigFireTimer are variables that are updated every Update on the Authority, but they are only useful in case the Authority gets transferred. So what we can do using the Optimization panel is to reduce the frequency they are sent to other Clients to a much more manageable value of once every second.

This might not be very precise and would have been unacceptable in the case of a visible timer, but here it doesn't matter. To the players this is going to be invisible, but we avoid a lot of network traffic.

Running this logic on the Server (Simulator)

As mentioned before, this mini state-machine behavior can run perfectly on one of the connected Clients. There is one catch though: this way, if no one is connected, the fire will stop updating because no one is simulating it, and thus it will never burn out.

Try this: connect, throw an object on the fire, disconnect, and reconnect after some time. The value of fireTimer will still be the same and so the fire will still be burning no matter how much time has passed.

Using an Authority transfer, it is trivial to let this behaviour run on a Simulator if there is one connected. Look into the Campfire class, within OnLiveQuerySynced:

With this simple code, whenever a Simulator connects and sees the persistent campfire network entity, it will take Authority over it. If it were ever to go offline and a client is connected, that Client would take back Authority. If the Simulator comes back online, it would steal it again. And so on.

Topics covered

| |

We saw in the previous section about how sometimes it makes sense not to move authority around between Clients. At this point, Network Commands are the way to interact with a remote object.

Now let's take a look at another case of remote object, where the interactions with it need to be validated by the one holding authority, to avoid nasty cases of concurrency.

Our use case

In this project, it is the case of the trees that are placed in the scene. The first Client or Simulator to connect will take authority over them, and it will keep it until they disconnect.

When a player wants to chop a tree, they request the Authority to subtract 1 unit of energy. When the energy runs out, it's the Authority that spawns a new Log instance.

This centralization, as opposed to passing authority around, allows multiple players to chop the same tree at the same time and prevents many race conditions, because the important action (destroying the tree and spawning the log) is all resolved on the Client with Authority.

Conceptually, we can imagine the event flow to go like this:

(1) Chop action happens on a Client -> (2) Authority is notified, elaborates new state -> (3) Authority sends result to all others -> (4) All other Clients play out animation and effects

The code

You can find this flow in practice in the ChoppableTree.cs script. In this script, only one variable is synchronized, the energy of the tree:

The flow goes like this:

(1) A player presses the button to chop down the tree.

It locally invokes the method TryChop(), which checks if the tree hasn't been already chopped down, subtracts energy locally, and also invokes the Chop() method, locally or remotely depending if authority on this tree is here or not.

(2) On the Authority, the Chop() method is called, and checks if the tree needs to be effectively cut down based on its energy:

(3) If so, CutDown() is invoked locally, spawning the log and informing all other clients to play the animation of the tree disappearing:

(4) Finally, other Clients play animation, particles and sound locally in ChangeState(). They will also see the log spawn thanks to the automatic network-instantiation.

Changing a synced variable on non-authoritative Clients

Why do we subtract energy from a synced variable in TryChop() when we are not the Authority?

Ultimately, the final word on whether the tree has been chopped down completely is always on the Authority's side, of course. But by subtracting energy locally and immediately, we can deal with cases where the player manages to produce two or more chop inputs before the Network Command has travelled to the Authority (and back) with a result.

Imagine: the tree has 1 energy. If we didn't subtract energy locally, the player would be able to chop several times because until the Authority tells them that the tree is down, they still think it has 1 energy.

In fact, it would send several Chop() Network Commands for no reason, which the Authority would have do discard on arrival.

Instead, if we immediately change the value on the variable and we use it as an indication of whether we can chop or not this will stop the chopping after one hit, as it should be.

Soon, the Authority will have elaborated on its side that the tree has gone down, and will inform our Client (with ChangeState()). Because energy is a synced variable, it will be overwritten again with the value computed on the Authority - which of course will be 0 at this point, so it will match.

So nothing is lost and no state is compromised, but with this little trick we get immediate feedback and we avoid some unneeded network traffic.

Once you have learned the basics using the tutorial project, Campfire is the natural follow-up to get acquainted with more advanced and practical topics.

As with First Steps, you can download the whole Campfire Unity project and explore it at your own pace. Instead of being a series of independent scenes, Campfire is one big scene that presents multiple concepts working together at the same time. We recommend using the pages on this section as guidance on the individual topics, starting with getting acquainted with the .

Download the Unity project

The Unity project can be downloaded from its . The Readme will tell you the minimum Unity version to use.

Try a pre-made build

To quickly try out the game, we shared a WebGL build on the . You can play it directly in the browser, or download one of the available desktop versions. Share the link with friends and colleagues, and try it together!

Play as a Client

To play as a regular Client, make sure that the GameObject called Simulator is disabled in the scene Main:

Without it, the game will behave as a pure Client and spawn a player character on connection.

Making a Client build

If you want to make a game build, simply having that object off will produce a Client build. You can run many Client builds to experience multiplayer gameplay.

Play as the Simulator

First, enable the Simulator GameObject in the scene.

Now press Play and connect.

The robot will start acting, exactly like it would do if it were running on a Simulator (minus, of course, the network delay). This allows you to see what would be happening on the server, with the full debugging power of the Unity Editor.

You can even use this Editor instance running alongside one or more Client builds.

Building the Simulator

To create a Simulator build, you have two ways to go about it, as usual:

• building a Simulator to launch locally on your machine

• building one to upload on the coherence Cloud

In both cases, make sure that the Simulator GameObject is enabled in the scene.

Don't change the Keeper Robot's Simulate In property like described in the previous section, since to run this behavior on the Simulator we want it to stay Server Side.

Topics covered

| Flexible authority

Even when creating a game that is mainly client-driven, we can still run some of the code on a Simulator. This is very useful to create, for instance, an NPC that operates even when all Clients (players) are disconnected, to give a semblance of a living world.

Our use case

In this project we used this pattern for the little yellow robot that sits beside the camp. If players move one of the camp's key objects out of place, the robot will tidy up after them. It can even recreate burned objects out of thin air!

Because this behavior is run by a Simulator, even if no-one is connected, given enough time all objects will be back in their place.

Prefab setup

To setup the robot Prefab to be run by a Simulator couldn't be simpler. The only thing we need to do is to set the Simulate In property of the CoherenceSync to Server Side.

We also set both the KeeperRobot script and the NavMeshAgent to disable on remote instances from the coherence Configuration panel, so they automatically turns themselves off on Client machines.

The code

Besides the simple state machine code that runs it, only one thing is worth noting here.

The exact moment when the robot starts acting is not in Start like usual. We imagined this behavior for an always-on world, so that it could start acting even long after other Clients disconnected. To ensure this, we hook into the onLiveQuerySynced event of the CoherenceBridge:

This way, the Simulator has the time to sync up with whatever happened to the campfire objects on the Replication Server, before even beginning to act.

This means that while gameplay can benefit from the presence of this NPC, it's not dependent on it. The Simulator can be always online, or connect and disconnect at times, or to be online only at certain times of the day, and so on.

Coding behaviors like this can open up many creative possibilities in the game's design.

Hiding code from the Clients

One typical pattern here is to wrap any server-side logic in the conditional compilation directive #if COHERENCE_SIMULATOR. This is a great idea especially if the code needs to be obfuscated to normal Client builds, because by doing so, it won't be compiled in the Client at all.

We did it, but we were careful to leave some things out:

As you can see, we left out the 4 Network Commands used to play sounds, and the properties they need to do it. The idea here is that the authoritative instance of the robot, which is running the logic on the Simulator, instructs the non-authoritative instances to play sounds when needed.

Remember that disabling a script only prevents Unity functions to be called (Awake, Start, Update...), but it doesn't prevent invoking its methods.

Testing server behavior on a Client in the Editor

Finally, you might have noticed how we not only compile this code for Simulator builds, but also when in the Unity editor:

This allows us to quickly test the behavior of this robot without adding and removing compilation directives. By simply changing the Simulate In property of the CoherenceSync to Client Side, we can hit the Play button and see the robot move, as if a Simulator was connected.

This is a great way to speed up development and one of the advantages of coherence's flexible authority model: you don't need to code a behavior in a special way to change it from Client to Server side and vice versa.

It is good practice though to switch the robot to Server Side again at regular intervals, and test the game by making an actual Simulator build, in order to create the whole network scenario with all its actors.

This will help locate bugs that have to do with timing, connection speed, authority transfers, etc.

Topics covered

Object lifecycle | | Runtime Unique IDs

In many cases, creating and destroying GameObjects like usual will be enough. Just call Instantiate() or Destroy(), and coherence takes care of instantiating and destroying the appropriate Prefab instance on each connected Client.

However, there are moments when it makes sense to customize how exactly coherence does this. To take full control over the lifetime of the object, or to attach custom behavior to these events.

coherence provides by default (and we use one too), but for ultimate control we also have the ability to create new, completely custom ones.

Our use case

The campsite in this demo has a few pre-placed unique objects in the scene, that can be picked up, moved, and burned on the campfire.

Until the comes in and recreates them, they will not be replaced.

When we burn them, we could in theory just destroy the instance. However the burn code is deeply nested in the Burnable.cs class which is used not only by these unique objects, but also by the pooled and non-unique wood logs.

In this method we do this:

However, by default unique network entities also get disabled, not destroyed. This doesn't work for our special objects!

We could potentially add an if statement in the GetBurned() above, detect if the object being destroyed is a log or not, and act differently based on that. Or subclass the Burnable and implement overrides for GetBurned...

... or we can just create a custom instantiator, and take full control of the object's lifecycle. Let's see the code.

The custom instantiator

Creating a custom instantiator is trivial. We just need a class to implement the interface INetworkObjectInstantiator, like so:

The key parts of this script being that on network entity creation a simple Object.Instantiate() is performed, and on release Object.Destroy(). The other methods (omitted here) are actually empty.

We also want to prepend the class with the DisplayName attribute so it shows up in the dropdown when we configure a CoherenceSync. Now the UniqueBurnableObjects instantiator appears alongside the others in the Instantiate via dropdown:

That's it, the instantiator is ready to use.

When we call ReleaseInstance() now, it will act differently depending on which instantiator the Prefab is configured to use: the wood logs get disabled, but the unique campfire objects get destroyed.

This was a very simple use case for customization, but it illustrates how easy it can be to get in control of the lifetime of Prefab instances associated to network entities.

Object anchors

One interesting thing we do with anchors is that they are themselves unique objects, but because they are spawned at runtime, they need to get their unique ID dynamically at runtime.

The code is in the PersistentObject class:

We take the ManualUniqueId from the object spawning it (i.e., "Boombox"), and we combine with the string "-anchor" to create a new unique ID, "Boombox-anchor". We register this ID to the UniquenessManager of the CoherenceBridge to inform it that the next spawned network entity will have that ID. And then we simply call Instantiate().

Because they are set to be Persistent, even though a player has burned something and disconnected, the anchors stay on the Replication Server. When a Simulator connects it will find these placeholders and, thanks to the synced properties, will know exactly what to recreate and where to put it.

The check code is in KeeperRobot.cs, under CheckAnchors() and ActOnAnchor().

First, each anchor's isObjectPresent property is used for a quick scan. This property is synced.

If the object is still present, the robot needs to get a reference to it. It calls GetLinkedObject() on the anchor, which does this:

Once again using the UUID of the object this anchor is a placeholder for (holdingForUUID) as a key, we can now ask the UniquenessManager to retrieve an object that has that UUID.

With a reference to this, the robot can now put it back into place using the anchor's position and rotation as a reference.

And if the object has been destroyed (isObjectPresent is false), the robot proceeds to recreate it.

After that, like we saw before, the robot registers the newly recreated object with the UniquenessManager so that it has the same UUID that it had before being burned.

The object is reinstated, and to a new Client connecting, it will look exactly the same as if it never got removed.

Before we dive into the networking-specific topics, in this introductory page we'll quickly go over how the whole gameplay is structured and set up. We'll cover it both from a point of view of Prefabs and of code so you know where to look for what.

Controls

Player characters, interactions

You'll find the Player Prefab in Prefabs/Characters.

When connecting, an instance of the Player is instantiated in the scene by the PlayerHandler script, which listens to the corresponding event fired by CoherenceBridge.

The player character is a Rigidbody-driven kinematic capsule that is hovering above the ground slightly, and detecting the ground via a raycast. Movement values are provided by the Move script on its root, which is in turn informed by the PlayerInput component. When instantiated over the network both these components are disabled, and the Rigidbody is set to be kinematic.

Besides movement, other actions are controlled by scripts on three child GameObjects: Interactions, Emotes, and Chat.

When pressing the interaction key, the right action will be carried on by one of the scripts ChopAction, SitAction, and GrabAction, depending on the type of the object highlighted (a ChoppableTree, a Chair, or a Grabbable).

Chopping down trees

The trees have an Interactable script that indicates which mesh gets highlighted.

They have an amount of energy that determines the number of times they need to be chopped to be cut down. When they run out, they transition to a chopped state and spawn a tree log. A coroutine makes them spring out again after a certain amount of time.

The campfire

The campfire is at the center of this demo. Players can burn anything they can pick up by simply throwing the object into it. The campfire exists only in one instance and is pre-placed in the scene, and marked as unique on the network by setting the Uniqueness property of its CoherenceSync to No Duplicates.

Most of the logic of the campfire is in the Campfire component. This handles a lot of the networking flow, and can be run by a Client but, if a Simulator connects, they will take over.

Carrying and burning objects

They are all Prefab Variants of a base Prefab called Base_BurnableObject, which you can inspect to get a sense of the common functionality.

The objects have several scripts: Grabbable provides the ability for them to be picked up, carried and thrown, while Burnable grants the ability to be burnt on the campfire.

They have a collider at the root which determines collisions, but a child GameObject named Interaction (and its Interactable script) has the trigger collider that makes it interactive, and allows to pick the object up. The Interactable script also holds a reference to the objects to highlight when the player's interaction trigger intersects the object.

Burnable types

The server-side Keeper Robot

The Keeper Robot is an NPC designed to be run by a Simulator (aka, the "server"), to restore the campsite to its initial state even when no-one is connected.

Its script will cycle through all unique campfire objects every X seconds. If an object has been destroyed, it will recreate it and put it in its place. If it has been moved, it will just chase it down and put it back into its place.

Chairs and sitting

Sitting is one of the three actions that can be performed by interacting with objects. It doesn't have networking effects, so it's not covered in this tutorial pages.

Topics covered

Networked audio | Networked particles | Animation Events

Usually, visual feedback can be expressed via syncing variables like Animator parameters, positions, and rotations. But sometimes we have the need to play sounds and particles, which are not types that can be automatically set to sync, or that we can send as arguments of Network Commands. So how to do it?

Our use case

This project has a lot of moments where particles and sounds need to play, and we used different strategies for different cases, depending on how fast, repeated, or slow the action is.

The simple way: controlling AudioSource or ParticleSystem directly

The most straightforward solution to play a sound is to use a Network Command. Using Commands, you can remotely invoke methods on AudioSource or ParticleSystem components.

To do that, you could simply open the coherence Configuration panel (from the CoherenceSync), and check the methods you're interested in.

While this is a perfectly fine way of doing things, it requires you to call multiple Network Commands in case you wanted to play a sound and particles at the same time. This could lead to desynchronisation between sound and visuals.

As such, in this project we preferred compacting these calls into methods on their own that are invoked as one Network Command, often without parameters to minimize the data being sent across.

Triggering a sound associated to an action

Connected to the above, let's see how to create our own Network Commands to play sounds (or particles) as a result of an event that happened remotely.

For instance, the Keeper Robot has a series of voices that play whenever it is performing an action. The robots is always controlled by the Simulator, so we need to play sounds on the Clients' devices.

For these sounds, we isolated the sound-playing behavior into Commands of their own. At the end of the KeeperRobot.cs class, we have:

[Command] public void PlayHumSound() => soundHandler.Play(humLoop);
[Command] public void PlayVoiceSound() => soundHandler.Play(voices);
[Command] public void PlayConjure() => soundHandler.Play(objectConjure);
[Command] public void PlayAppear() => soundHandler.Play(objectAppear);

(soundHandler is a script attached to the same gameObject)

Each of these methods is invoked as a Network Command, like so:

_sync.SendCommand(nameof(PlayVoiceSound), MessageTarget.Other);

You can see how we don't play the sound over the network, that would be bandwidth-consuming for no reason, but we just communicate the intention to play it.

Alternative: building an index

Because we only have 4 sounds, we sort of "brute-forced" this, and created an individual Network Command for each sound. This is not a bad idea from the point of view of network traffic: sending a Network Command with no parameter produces less traffic than sending one with.

But it could be unwieldy if we had - say - 100 different sounds to play.

This solution also requires us to bake and produce a new schema if we add or remove one of these Commands. So for a more flexible solution, it could be nice to index the sounds and maybe create a generic Command like:

[Command] public void PlaySound(int id) => soundHandler.Play(sounds[id]);

In this case though, it was ok to go for individual Commands.

Audio and particles tied to animations

There are actions that are really quick or short, and asking to play a sound via a command might result in a mismatch between the visuals (an animation) and the sound, due to network delay.

For instance, it wouldn't make sense to send a Command to inform other Clients to play the sound of a footstep. Chances are, by the time they receive the Command, another two-three footsteps have happened.

So for footsteps, jump, landing, and more; we used a slightly different strategy. Audio and particles are all played locally as part of the animation, using Unity's own Animation Events.

A script called PlayAnimationEvents.cs (remember to add it to the same object as the Animator!) listens to these events. An example from it:

public void PlayJumpEffects()
{
    soundHandler.Play(jumpSFX);
    jumpParticles.Play();
    StopRunParticles();
}

This ensures an immediate playback, in sync with the animation. Plus, it produces zero network traffic.

So yes, fun fact: to "network" sounds and particles often you can do without networking anything at all!

public void PlayStepSound(AnimationEvent evt)
{
    if (evt.animatorClipInfo.weight > 0.5)
    {
        soundHandler.Play(footstepSFX);
    }
}

Topics covered

Chat | Lobbies

Communication is an inherent part of online games and a chat, however simple, is a great way to enhance the range of expression for the players.

Our use case

We wanted to implement a very simple chat system. By pressing Enter, a small screen-space UI opens up and allows the player to compose a message. When they press Enter again, a balloon on top of their character displays the message to them, and to all connected Clients.

This is done in three parts.

The Chat script on the player reads the input, requests ChatComposerUI to display the chat composer that is part of the screen-space scene UI.

When the player sends a chat message, Chat is informed by an event sent by ChatComposerUI, and sends a Network Command SendChatMessage to all other clients.

Finally, the received message is displayed in world-space over the player's head the script ChatVisualiserUI present in the Player Prefab.

Getting extra mileage with byte[]

By default, coherence's Network Commands have a limit in the length that can be sent in one command. This is limited by the length of a UDP packet. While this limitation might be removed in the future, for now it means that chat messages can't be longer than a certain amount.

This amount, however, is quite different depending if you use a parameter of type string or of type byte[] (byte array). If you send a string, you will be able to pass on around 50 characters. This is really not much for a chat system.

If you use byte[] though, the number of characters goes up to (around) 500. Now we're talking!

So what we do in this demo is that first we convert the string that the player has typed in the UI into a byte array, and we send that via Network Command:

private void SendText(InputAction.CallbackContext _)
{
    string message = _chatComposer.GetText();
    if (message != string.Empty)
    {
        byte[] encodedMessage = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(message);
        sync.SendCommand<Chat>(nameof(SendChatMessage), MessageTarget.Other, encodedMessage);
    }
    // ...
}

Then, on the receiving side, we reconvert it back into a string:

[Command(defaultRouting = MessageTarget.Other)]
public void SendChatMessage(byte[] encodedMessage)
{
    string decodedMessage = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(encodedMessage);
    chatVisualiser.ShowText(decodedMessage);
    // ...
}

This simple trick allows us to send longer messages, or to send the same message generating less traffic.

Never miss a chat message

Because we are sending the chat messages on the CoherenceSync that is on the Player Prefab, it means that if that particular player instance is not visible to a Client because it's outside of their LiveQuery, they won't receive the Network Command and thus the chat message. This is maybe desirable in this demo, where the chat is visualised on top of the player.

But if chat messages are shown in a UI panel and players should receive them all regardless, then it might make more sense to rely on a special type of CoherenceSync: Client Connections. By sending the Network Command on that, it would ensure that the Command is sent and received regardless of LiveQuery ranges.

Long-form chats